8/8/2023 0 Comments Quickcopy tape![]() You can generate a pinned citation key by selecting one or more items, right-clicking, and selecting Generate BibTeX key, which will add the current citation key to the extra field, thereby pinning it. You can fix the citation key (called pinning in BBT) for an item by adding the text Citation Key: anywhere in theĮxtra field of the item on a line of its own. Such keys are called dynamic keys, which are marked with a pushpin the item list view and in the item details to distinguish them from dynamic keys. Show your citation keys in the item list view.īy default, BBT generates the citation key from the item information, and this key may change when you edit the item. ![]() Drag and drop LaTeX citations using these keys to your favorite LaTeX editor.Generate citation keys from JabRef(-ish) patterns.BBT is conservative about citation key changes, and allows you to fix keys to any value of your choosing.BBT generates citation keys that take into account other existing keys in your library in a deterministic way, regardless of what part of your library you export, or the order in which you do it. Stable citation keys, without key clashes.As the citation key is the piece of data that connects yourīibliography, this is a piece of data you want to have control over. People usually pick a naming scheme related to them. You can’t see the citation keys until you export themįor a LaTeX author, the citation keys have their own meaning, fully separate from the other entry data, even if.The keys are always auto-generated, so if you correct a typo in the author name or title, the key will change.If a non-unique key is generated, which one gets postfixed with a distinguishing character is essentially.For serious LaTeX users, “usually” presents the following problems: I proudly wear the banner of the Shittiest SysAdmin on r/sysadmin.The BibTeX citations keys generated by the standard Zotero exporters are always generated at time of export, using an algorithm that usually generates unique keys. In that light, take what I say with a grain of salt and feel free to call me a fucking dumbass if it's warranted. I have an Overland Neo4000e tape library hooked up to my Sun v480 with two LTO5 drives in the chassis. I work for a graphics company, so 10GB Photoshop files are the rule, not the exception. For a very small company, we generate ass loads of new data on a daily basis. My boss was grilled by a major client of ours about offsite backup. As a result he's now motivated to do something about it. ![]() He's an honest guy and won't lie to the client about our capabilities, but his thriftiness make the Scotch look like free-spending drunken sailors. I've had to hold this network together with spit and bailing wire for quite a few years now. To give you an idea of what I'm dealing with, months after we started off-site tape rotation, I found out that the off-site storage location was the trunk of my boss' car. ಠ_ಠĪnyway, boss man wants to take home a full backup once a month and then daily incrementals. I also need copies of those here in case we need to recover files off of tape. I was thinking of a LTO5 tape duplicator, but this thing is $19k, and won't get approved. One thought I had is using rsync to direct incremental backups to a daily directory and then making two full copies of that directory to tape. ![]() Since I'm using ZFS on Solaris, another thought would be sending daily snapshots to a folder and then backing that directory up on either tape or 2.5 HD. A 500GB hard drive is much cheaper than tape, and since the media will be rotated on a monthly basis it doesn't have to have a 5 year shelf life. IT best practices aren't practiced around here, so please give it to me with both barrels if need be.Even Symantec NetBackup Appliances (which are carefully specified, built, and tuned) are only 'unofficially' capable of driving two tape drives, and this is also 'unofficially' only when they are quiet - i.e. Not having to perform backups, and are thus free to duplicate (re-hydrate) to tape. To build your own server capable of reaching these levels, or exceeding them, requires very careful system design, and a pocket full of money to specify/purchase/build a powerful server. So if you have 10 TB to duplicate to tape, and you have have a server capable of re-hydrating (sustained random read IOPs/throughput) and thus capable of reading MSDP disk at 120 MB/s - to match the typical minimum sustained write throughput of 120 MB/s to one LTO6 tape drive - then if you had 10TB to duplicate to tape, it would take 24 hours: 10.0 Here's a simple calculation, which assumes that your server is even capable of this.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |